Talk:History of Poland
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Poland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of History of Poland was copied or moved into History of Poland during the Piast dynasty with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of History of Poland was copied or moved into History of Poland during the Jagiellon dynasty with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Various deficiencies of this article
[edit]1. Concerning the introduction: "The first ruling dynasty, the Piasts, emerged in the 10th century AD. Duke Mieszko I is considered the de facto creator of the Polish state and is widely recognized for his adoption of Western Christianity in 966 CE. Mieszko's dominion was formally reconstituted as a medieval kingdom in 1025 by his son Bolesław I the Brave, known for military expansion under his rule. The most successful and the last Piast monarch, Casimir III the Great, presided over a period of economic prosperity and territorial aggrandizement before his death in 1370 without male heirs."
Considering that the newly established Kingdom of Poland saw several periods without any centralized power, which allowed German and Bohemian rulers to exploit the situation to their benefit, it seems warranted to mention at least in some way, in a sentence or half-sentence, that Piast rule between the 10th and 14th century was intermittent and had to be re-established several times.
2. I would also add that Boreslaw I. established Poland among the Christian realms of Europe, safe-guarding it from Western intrusions under the pretense of spreading Christianity, while adding that very aspect to his own campaigns against pagan rules.
3. The entire article doesn't produce a single match for terms like "german/germanic migration", the first match for "germanization" is found in the section dealing with the early 20th century. A quote from the German WP entry on the time around 1250:
"This period saw increased colonisation of Polish territories by emigrants from the Holy Roman Empire. By 1250, large parts of Pomerania and Silesia had been settled with Germans and Flemings, who were brought into the country by local lords such as the Griffins in Pomerania and the Silesian Piasts. The Pomeranian nobles, as well as the Silesian princes, primarily hoped that the new settlers would bring them greater economic prosperity, better tax revenues and, above all, a faster connection to the (rural) economic-urban standards of Western Europe. Due to the number of new settlers and the personal commitment and promotion of eastern settlement by the Polish sovereigns, large parts of medieval Poland became part of the German-speaking area over the centuries and permanently lost their Slavic-Polish character. Also, some rulers, such as the Silesian Piasts, voluntarily opened themselves up to Germanism by appointing Germans to high offices in the state and in ecclesiastical structures and marrying princesses from German noble houses, which resulted in kinship ties to the German high nobility. The fact that the Griffin and the Silesian Piast were senior Polish dukes and the most powerful sovereigns in the first half of the 13th century further favoured eastern colonisation and the spread of Germanism in Silesia and beyond its borders. The deslavisation and the corresponding Germanisation took place peacefully and was not a brutal German land seizure of Polish territories - however, conflicts resulting from a lack of consideration of the interests of the local indigenous population through the process of eastern settlement between the long-established Poles and the immigrants, the majority of whom did not speak Slavic, cannot be ruled out. Only at the end of the 13th century and from the beginning of the 14th century did a contrary movement begin, whereby the cultural-economic dominance and influence of Germanism in the core provinces of Poland (Lesser and Greater Poland) was pushed back and which led to the repolonisation of wide swathes of land and many towns."
It seems that leaving out entirely the origins of the Ethnic German minority in Poland which will become very relevant later on when it comes to Post-WWII violent expropriation, expulsions and the transfer of half a million Ethnic Germans to forced labour camps - does not add to the integrity of the article. Hisredrighthand ⚔Tally-ho!⚔ 22:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 June 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
81.66.219.75 (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Occupation of Ukraine and enslavement of Ukrainians as an act of genocide
[edit]The biggest layer of polish colonization history is not presented fairly. Ukrainians were deprived of their own houses, land and lives and became polish property. 81.66.219.75 (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- That's a weird and by no means an encyclopedic opinion. First signs of feudalism appeared in Ruthenian duchies located in Ukraine already in 11th century and serfdom achieved its somewhat final form under the Lithuanian rule. Moreover, serf was never a "property" under the Polish law. I won't even touch the subject of "depriving Ukrainians of their houses and lives" because it's so ridiculous it doesn't deserve a discussion. 87.205.67.92 (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit request to correct grammar.
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "case of successful elective king" to "case of a successful elective king" at the "First elective kings" section of Establishment. Meteorname (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 17:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Map
[edit]I am requesting for the inclusion of this map of the Second Polish Republic in the section " Second Polish Republic (1918-1939) ".Gauhar2806 (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class Poland articles
- Top-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles
- B-Class European history articles
- High-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- B-Class history articles
- Top-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles